Scenario Analysis
تحلیل حساسیت
Scenario Analysis
Scenario Analysis – The Worst Case Probabilities.
RCSA and its various exercises are often known and discussed by risk managers and auditors but there is almost little or no knowledge about Scenario analysis.
Scenario Analysis also known as ” What if ” case or worst possible case scenario has the potential to absolutely obliterate the organizations especially financial institutions if not taken seriously
In this post we will try to shed some light on it.
Scenario Analysis – Defined
As per Basel II , Scenario Analysis is a mechanism, where in Banks use expert opinion in conjunction with external data to evaluate its exposure to high-severity events. This approach draws on the knowledge of experienced business managers and risk management experts to derive reasoned assessments of plausible severe losses.
Scenario Analysis talks about fat tail events i.e the events which are extremely unlikely to occur but may cause catastrophic losses or disruptions or both to an organization.
Scenario Analysis – Methods
Scenario Analysis is generally done via
a) Workshop Method
Requires facilitation from the operational risk department. The residual risks are scored on the scale of High, medium, low scale Probabilities.
b) Interview Method
The questionnaire is distributed to each department for self assessed scores.
Scenario Analysis – Preparation
The preparation is similar to RCSA exercises done in the organization.
a) The team interviews the key business and functional managers for the area under consideration
b) Various earlier audits and compliance reports are also reviewed
c) Internal & External loss events are analysed
d) List of Possible scenarios are shortlisted on the basis of above research via interview or workshop method for consideration
Scenario Analysis – Output
The goal of scenario analysis is to deduce reasoned assessments of plausible severe losses Some methods produce an average loss estimate, a worst case loss estimate and frequency estimates for each. Others produce a range of loss estimates with frequency estimates for each loss.
This output is then used to calculate for capital calculation requirements for the Bank.
Scenario Analysis – Challenges
The biggest challenge in truly implementing scenario analysis is inherent biases and they are particularly two classes of biases
a) Judgemental Bias such as Anchoring, bias basis on past records
b) Motivational bias (based on personal interests)
Scenario analysis though designed to produce fat- tail estimates is often also responsible for the identification of significant risk mitigation activities in the organizations.
As the process of RCSA and scenario analysis is almost
similar there remains a chance of overlap but as RCSA doesn’t consider Fat tail events, the identified KRI (risk) in RCSA is often also mimicked for fat tail events for better assessment and monitoring of operational risk management.
Scenario Analysis – The Worst Case Probabilities.
RCSA and its various exercises are often known and discussed by risk managers and auditors but there is almost little or no knowledge about Scenario analysis.
Scenario Analysis also known as ” What if ” case or worst possible case scenario has the potential to absolutely obliterate the organizations especially financial institutions if not taken seriously
In this post we will try to shed some light on it.
Scenario Analysis – Defined
As per Basel II , Scenario Analysis is a mechanism, where in Banks use expert opinion in conjunction with external data to evaluate its exposure to high-severity events. This approach draws on the knowledge of experienced business managers and risk management experts to derive reasoned assessments of plausible severe losses.
Scenario Analysis talks about fat tail events i.e the events which are extremely unlikely to occur but may cause catastrophic losses or disruptions or both to an organization.
Scenario Analysis – Methods
Scenario Analysis is generally done via
a) Workshop Method
Requires facilitation from the operational risk department. The residual risks are scored on the scale of High, medium, low scale Probabilities.
b) Interview Method
The questionnaire is distributed to each department for self assessed scores.
Scenario Analysis – Preparation
The preparation is similar to RCSA exercises done in the organization.
a) The team interviews the key business and functional managers for the area under consideration
b) Various earlier audits and compliance reports are also reviewed
c) Internal & External loss events are analysed
d) List of Possible scenarios are shortlisted on the basis of above research via interview or workshop method for consideration
Scenario Analysis – Output
The goal of scenario analysis is to deduce reasoned assessments of plausible severe losses Some methods produce an average loss estimate, a worst case loss estimate and frequency estimates for each. Others produce a range of loss estimates with frequency estimates for each loss.
This output is then used to calculate for capital calculation requirements for the Bank.
Scenario Analysis – Challenges
The biggest challenge in truly implementing scenario analysis is inherent biases and they are particularly two classes of biases
a) Judgemental Bias such as Anchoring, bias basis on past records
b) Motivational bias (based on personal interests)
Scenario analysis though designed to produce fat- tail estimates is often also responsible for the identification of significant risk mitigation activities in the organizations.
As the process of RCSA and scenario analysis is almost
similar there remains a chance of overlap but as RCSA doesn’t consider Fat tail events, the identified KRI (risk) in RCSA is often also mimicked for fat tail events for better assessment and monitoring of operational risk management.
Scenario Analysis بیشتر بخوانید »
